β Back to Resources
Grade 9-12
Housing Law
Tenant v. Landlord
Landlord withheld security deposit for "cleaning" and "damage". Tenant sues for return of deposit.
Real World Connection
The most common case in Small Claims Court nationwide. This teaches the difference between "Normal Wear and Tear" (not deductible) and "Damage" (deductible). Students learn the practical importance of documenting rental conditions.
β‘ Legal Issues
Security Deposit Law
Wear and Tear vs Damage
Burden of Proof
π Case Facts
- Tenant lived in apartment for 2 years.
- Security deposit was $1,500.
- Landlord charged $1,000 for cleaning and carpet replacement.
- Carpet was 5 years old when tenant moved in.
- Tenant left apartment broom-clean.
π₯ Witnesses
π€
Plaintiff/Prosecution
Tenant
Plaintiff
Statement
I scrubbed that place for days before I left. The carpet was already old when I moved inβit had normal wear from two years of living there. He's just trying to get a free carpet upgrade on my dime.
Key Facts to Establish
- Cleaned thoroughly
- Has move-in photos
- Carpet was already aged
Potential Weaknesses
- Small stain on carpet
- Minor wall marks
π€
Defense
Landlord
Defendant
Statement
The place smelled like dog and the carpet was ruined. I had to pay $1,200 for new carpet. I'm actually being generous only charging $1,000. Normal wear doesn't include pet stains.
Key Facts to Establish
- Has cleaning receipt
- Claims pet damage
Potential Weaknesses
- No itemized list initially
- Carpet was depreciated
- No proof of pet
π Jury Instructions
The jury must decide:
- Is carpet wear after 2 years "normal wear and tear" or "damage"?
- Did the landlord properly document and itemize deductions?
- How much, if any, of the security deposit should be returned?