← Back to Resources
Grade 9-12
Contract Law
Brand v. Influencer
A brand sues an influencer for not posting as agreed and posting negative content about the product.
Real World Connection
Reflects modern disputes like the Fyre Festival marketing lawsuits or cases where influencers like Luka Sabbat were sued for failing to post. It teaches "Material Breach" of contract—did the influencer fail to do the main thing they were hired for?
⚡ Legal Issues
Breach of Contract
Material Breach
Damages
📋 Case Facts
- Influencer was paid $5,000 upfront.
- Contract required 3 Instagram posts.
- Influencer posted only 2 posts.
- One post contained negative comments about the product.
👥 Witnesses
👤
Plaintiff/Prosecution
Brand Representative
Plaintiff
Statement
We paid for promotion, not criticism. She bashed the product to her million followers and didn't even finish all the posts. We want our money back plus damages for the negative publicity.
Key Facts to Establish
- Contract was clear
- Payment made in full
- Negative post hurt sales
Potential Weaknesses
- May have been too controlling
- No damage proof
👤
Defense
Influencer
Defendant
Statement
The product broke after one use! I have to be honest with my fans—that's my brand. I posted twice. They can keep some money for my time, but I'm not a fraud.
Key Facts to Establish
- Product defective
- Honesty to audience
- Partial performance
Potential Weaknesses
- Took the money
- Did not complete 3 posts
- Contract had no "honesty" clause
📜 Jury Instructions
The jury must decide:
- Was there a material breach of the contract by the influencer?
- What damages, if any, should be awarded to the Brand?
- Does the product being defective excuse the influencer's breach?