โ Back to Resources
Grade 9-12
Self Defense
State v. Miller
A physical altercation in a parking lot leads to a claim of self-defense after a shove.
Real World Connection
Similar to high-profile cases like State v. Zimmerman or the Michael Drejka parking spot shooting. It engages the debate between "Stand Your Ground" laws versus the "Duty to Retreat." Was the force proportional to the threat?
โก Legal Issues
Duty to Retreat
Self Defense
Proportionality
๐ Case Facts
- Verbal argument over a parking spot.
- Victim shoved Miller first.
- Miller punched Victim, breaking jaw.
- Miller could have walked away.
๐ฅ Witnesses
๐ค
Defense
Miller
Defendant
Statement
He screamed in my face and shoved me hard. I thought he was going to hit me again. I punched him once to stop him. I was defending myself!
Key Facts to Establish
- Did not start fight
- Feared further harm
- One punch
Potential Weaknesses
- Could have walked away
- Force was severe
- Broken jaw from one punch
๐ค
Plaintiff/Prosecution
Bystander
Witness
Statement
They were both yelling. The victim shoved him, but Miller really clocked him. He didn't need to hit him that hard. He could have just left.
Key Facts to Establish
- Saw shove first
- Punch was hard
- Retreat was possible
Potential Weaknesses
- Confirms victim started physical contact
๐ Jury Instructions
The jury must decide:
- Was Miller's use of force proportional to the threat he faced?
- Did Miller have a duty to retreat before using force?
- Was Miller reasonably in fear for his safety?